Remove topics right-to-appeal
article thumbnail

Ferragamo did not infringe Audrey Hepburn’s image/personality rights by stating that its shoes were originally designed for her

The IPKat

Is it an infringement of a person’s own personality/image rights to say that a shoe was designed for that person (and that fact is true)? The rationale of protection is rooted within the right to own’s own identity (Articles 2 and 22 of the Italian Constitution and 8 of the EU Charter ). Let’s see in more detail what happened.

article thumbnail

Catching Up on AI and Other Topics With Roy Kaufman

Velocity of Content

It is certainly a hot topic, and whether you look at government interventions or the spate of legal actions, it has to be seen as an important issue. CCC: I would expect that there is also a #2, #3 and #4 on that list of priority topics, though. Am I right? I read the DC Circuit Court of Appeals holding in the ASTM vs Public.

Licensing 123
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Book Review: Research Handbook on IP and Moral Rights

The IPKat

This is a book review of the Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Moral Rights , curated by Ysolde Gendreau (Université de Montréal, Canada), provided by Francesca Mazzi , Lecturer in AI, Innovation and Law at Brunel University London. Such gestures couldn't be overlooked in a book on moral rights. The topics vary.

article thumbnail

Piracy Shield: AGCOM Fines ISP Assoc. For ‘Obstructing Supervisory Activities’

TorrentFreak

Attacks on the press for telling the truth , public statements that everything was running to plan, and a refusal to commit to a level of transparency that would allow those wrongfully affected to exercise their right to complain. All that remained to be seen was when, at what scale, and how any chaos would be managed.

Copying 95
article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence is not breaking patent law: EPO publishes DABUS decision (J 8/20)

The IPKat

The EPO Board of Appeal has published its full decision on the question of whether a machine can be an inventor ( J 8/20 ). The Board of Appeal had previously announced its decision to refuse two European patent applications naming an algorithm ("DABUS") as the sole inventor at the end of last year ( IPKat ).

article thumbnail

What Are the DuPont Factors in a Trademark Confusion Analysis?

Erik K Pelton

A topic that comes up all the time in our line of work is the DuPont factors, and the analysis of them. from the Court of Patent Appeals in 1973, that then became known as the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) laid out the factors for analyzing a likelihood of confusion in any comparison of trademarks at the USPTO.

Trademark 130
article thumbnail

GuestPost: Do certain panel compositions of the UPC Court of Appeal breach article 6 ECHR?

The IPKat

The UPC Court of Appeal in Luxembourg Amidst the humblebrags and #blessed postings, LinkedIn these days is also full of posts on stats from the Unified Patent Court (UPC). As a result, the Court of Appeal took the position that for those appeals, the Court of Appeal's panel would be composed of only 3 Legally Qualified Judges (LQJs).

Art 67