Remove topics section-8
article thumbnail

ALI Proceeds Toward Vote on Restatement of Copyright, Critics Ignored

The Illusion of More

On June 7 and 8, the membership of the American Law Institute will vote on several sections of the Restatement of Copyright, covering a range of topics, including categories of works, scope of protection, ownership, and transfers of rights.

article thumbnail

Guest post: Exploring data privacy in Nigeria: Incorporated trustees of laws and rights awareness initiative v Nigerian Communications Commission

The IPKat

Background: A Clash of Rights The Incorporated Trustees of Laws and Rights Awareness Initiative filed a suit against the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) challenging the legality of Regulation 8(2)(a) and (c) of the Nigerian Communications (Enforcement Process etc) Regulations 2019 (the Regulations).

Privacy 57
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Announcing the Sixth Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials by Tushnet & Goldman

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Chapter 7: Special Topics in Competitor Lawsuits. Chapter 8: Consumer Class Actions. We reworked the section on compelled commercial disclosures and Zauderer. (I I have more to say on that topic imminently). Chapter 3: False Advertising Overview. Chapter 4: Deception. Chapter 5: Which Facts Matter? Chapter 11: Copyrights.

Editing 119
article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence is not breaking patent law: EPO publishes DABUS decision (J 8/20)

The IPKat

The EPO Board of Appeal has published its full decision on the question of whether a machine can be an inventor ( J 8/20 ). The decision in J 8/20 demonstrates that the current patent system is more than capable of dealing with AI inventions when and if they arise, without harming innovation or treating the AI inventors unfairly.

article thumbnail

when can pharma experts testify about compliance with the FDCA? (also some survey stuff)

43(B)log

8, 2023) Imprimis sued defendants, competitors in the compounding pharmacy industry, for false advertising, trademark and copyright infringement, and related claims. It alleged that defendants falsely advertised that they’re in compliance with Section 503A of the FDCA, governing compounding. 2023 WL 7390842, No. Although 54.1%

article thumbnail

The Interplay between Religious Sensitiveness and Trademark Law in India

IP and Legal Filings

A trademark application may be denied under part 9(2)(b)4 of the Trade Marks Act (TM Act) if the mark “contains or comprises of any matter likely to hurt the religious susceptibilities of any class or section of the citizens of India [6].” The legislature has not taken a stand on this topic. 8] 2011 (48) PTC 235 (Del.) (DB)

article thumbnail

AI Generated Art and its conflict with IPR

IIPRD

8] These protections were for the purpose protection of human creativity however the way AI has transformed how innovations are done, wherein creations are done without any sort of human interventions, in that case whether IP protection should be given or not becomes an important question. This still stands as an extremely contentious topic.

Art 52