Remove topics supreme-peoples-court
article thumbnail

The Not-Quite-So Legal Future for Web Scraping

Plagiarism Today

However, a recent ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals aims to clarify a key aspect of web scraping. The move follows a recent Supreme Court decision , which dealt with a police officer who used his access to official systems to access information for an unauthorized purpose. The Divisive History of Web Scraping.

Licensing 238
article thumbnail

How Prince and Warhol Got to the Supreme Court

Velocity of Content

It was in a constant state of motion, with people of all ages entering and interacting with the balloons and each other. Now, some of Warhol’s pieces are at the center of a pending Supreme Court case. Then, the Warhol estate successfully petitioned the Supreme Court to hear an appeal, with oral argument set for October 12. .

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The Interplay between Religious Sensitiveness and Trademark Law in India

IP and Legal Filings

It is easy for businesses to associate their products and services with religion since people are so deeply devoted to their faiths. Many businesses attempt to take advantage of this by adopting symbols that people link with their religions so that people will associate the goods being sold with them.

article thumbnail

EU Opinion: Streaming Services Are Not Liable for VPN ‘Pirates’

TorrentFreak

The latter can be helpful if people want to access a streaming service’s content library in another country. The matter went all the way up to the Supreme Court which, considering the complex VPN issue, sought clarification from Europe’s Highest Court ( CJEU ). For further reading, we recommend Prof.

article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence, machine learning and creativity in visual art: what are the protectability requirements? Part 1: the Italian Supreme Court’s “floral fractal” case

Kluwer Copyright Blog

In the first instance, the Court of Genoa with a judgment of 6 June 2018 attributed the authorship of the work to the claimant and confirmed violation of the copyright by RAI, which has made commercial use of the work in the context of the well-know Sanremo Festival. In addition, the Court held that the work was to be considered creative.

Art 75
article thumbnail

Who is liable when an artificial intelligence system infringes copyright – a missed opportunity by the PRC Court

LexBlog IP

In our previous newsletter here , we reported a decision from the Beijing Internet Court ruling that the copyright of a portrait generated by an artificial intelligence (“AI”) program is owned by the user who “controlled meticulously” the parameters for creating the image.

article thumbnail

The Cologne Cathedral is not Neuschwanstein

The IPKat

The court held that geographical indications must be free to be used by all, not least because they may be an indication of the quality and other characteristics of the goods concerned, and may also, in various ways, influence consumer tastes by, for instance, associating the goods with a place that may give rise to a favourable response.

Art 62