article thumbnail

Michelangelo’s David and cultural heritage images. The Italian pseudo-intellectual property and the end of public domain

Kluwer Copyright Blog

107-108 of the Legislative Decree 42/2004 , Cultural Heritage Code “Codice dei Beni Culturali” (the public law on the regulation of cultural heritage) and, by analogy, art. They merge and overlap pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests, such as public law (Legislative Decree 42/2004) and private law (Civil Code).

article thumbnail

Jean Paul Gaultier, Birth Your Own Venus

IPilogue

The Italian Code , which came into effect in 2004 and was updated in 2016, operates independently from copyright law. Following this designation , objects require authorization and a licence fee to be used commercially by third parties regardless of whether the work is in the public domain. In Canada, under the s.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Traditional Knowledge on the agenda for 2024

The IPKat

It also states that: No patents or any other form of intellectual property protection shall be granted or applied for by any person, within India or abroad, on any traditional knowledge or aggregation thereof, on any traditional knowledge obtained or derived from India, whether in the custody of the knowledge society or in public domain.

article thumbnail

The Fairest of Them All: Justice Abella’s Legacy in Canadian Copyright Law

IPilogue

The Court emphasized that upholding users’ rights was “central to developing a robustly cultured and intellectual public domain.”. When Justice Abella was appointed to the SCC in 2004, section 29 did not include the purposes of education, satire, and parody.

article thumbnail

The Much-Adapted “Peter Pan” (1904 – Forever )

Velocity of Content

Peter and the Starcatchers (2004 novel, the first in a series). And the 1911 content reused in these works may actually be in the public domain already. A field in the copyright record for this book at the Copyright Office reads “Authorship on Application: “Novelization: TriStar Pictures, Inc., employer for hire.” (As

article thumbnail

A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial! ??–Alper Automotive v. Day to Day Imports

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In 2004, the Ninth Circuit eviscerated it (in the Rossi case) by requiring plaintiffs to show that senders subjectively believed their takedown notices were abusive. Diebold from 2004, which led to a $125k damages award. As I’ve blogged many, many times on this blog (see list below), 512(f) has been a complete failure.

article thumbnail

Evolution of Tests of Creativity in Copyrights

IP and Legal Filings

For instance, in accordance with this doctrine, the author would be entitled to copyright protection if someone collected different poems that were previously in the public domain and produced in a single document. With the information in the public domain, the Rural Telephone Service issued a phone book. 4] 499 U.S.