article thumbnail

“Private” Facebook Groups Aren’t Legally “Private”–Davis v. HDR

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The plaintiff sued HDR for ECPA and common law privacy violations. Plaintiff had no authority over the Groups’ privacy settings and no voice in the screening process used to determine membership. While the court’s opinion is appropriately grounded in the precedent, it was tone-deaf to the privacy invasion. Implications.

Privacy 138
article thumbnail

Anti-Piracy Program Accused of Violating Citizens’ Fundamental Rights

TorrentFreak

Between 2010 and 2020, Hadopi issued 12.7 File-sharers had issues with the program for obvious reasons but for digital rights group La Quadrature du Net , massive internet surveillance to protect copying rights had arrived at the expense of citizens’ fundamental right to privacy.

Privacy 125
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Apple’s Dynamic Use of Trademark Law and Jamaica for its Dynamic Island Feature

IPilogue

Apple has a history of filing trademark applications in foreign jurisdictions going back to as early as 2010 , but is not the only company with knowledge of this strategy. On the other hand, perhaps not all companies deem a six-month window of privacy valuable enough to pursue this lengthy process. It is not just Apple.

article thumbnail

Vempati Ravi Shankar – Facebook Copyright Dispute: Issues on Moral Rights and Posthumous Enforcement of Celebrity Rights

SpicyIP

In 2010, in Kirtibhai Raval v. Raghuram Jaisukhram Chandrani the plaintiff (a descendant of late Jalaram Bapu) had claimed that Jalaram Bapu’s right to privacy and publicity would be violated if the defendants made a film about his life. Here, there was no discussion if privacy survives an individual’s death. Rajagopal v.

article thumbnail

2023 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In particular, age authentication mandates are riddled with unavoidable privacy and security concerns; they also make it harder to navigate the Internet and create an authentication infrastructure that censors and authoritarians will find easy to weaponize in the future. TikTok bans. Techlash + Sinophobia = unconstitutional censorship.

Law 105
article thumbnail

Much Ado About Penalties

LexBlog IP

Another is through Congress expressly giving the FTC penalty authority, and we have seen that in specific areas such as telemarketing and children’s privacy. Longtime FTC watchers may recall that back in 2010, there was a somewhat similar move afoot to give the FTC this type of broad fining authority. It never happened.

Privacy 52
article thumbnail

Facebook Faces Contributory Trademark Liability for Marketplace Listings–Car-Freshner v. Meta

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

There is conflicting evidence about when CFC created its Facebook account, and there is no evidence of the Terms from 2010 and whether CFC had to assent to the Terms to register its account. There is also no evidence that CFC received an e-mail containing the updated Terms.