Remove topics create-act
article thumbnail

Czech court finds that AI tool DALL-E cannot be the author of a copyright work

The IPKat

Background The claimant in this case, which is anonymised in the Court's judgment, had asked the AI program DALL-E to create an image for the claimant's website. Article 5(1) of the Act states, however, that the author of a work for the purposes of the Act is " the natural person who created the work ".

Copyright 145
article thumbnail

White House Executive Order on AI Punts on IP Issues

Intellectual Property Law Blog

The White House Executive Order on AI (“EO”) is comprehensive and covers a wide range of topics. One of the topics which raises many legal issues, particularly with generative AI (“genAI”), is intellectual property. We provided a summary here. It addresses many of the risks and problems that can arise with AI.

IP 262
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Copyright Office Guidance on AI

Intellectual Property Law Blog

The answer will depend on the circumstances, particularly how the AI tool operates and how it was used to create the final work If a work’s traditional elements of authorship were produced by a machine, the work lacks human authorship and the Office will not register it (e.g.,

Copyright 246
article thumbnail

Meta Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Counterfeit Ads

Plagiarism Today

However, she claims that counterfeit sellers are stealing her images and creating ads for knock off works on Facebook using them. Normally, a company like Facebook would be protected by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) from such arguments. The SMART Copyright Act aims to address this by having the U.S.

article thumbnail

EU law: Generative AI, copyright infringements and liability – My guess for a hot topic in 2024

Kluwer Copyright Blog

It does seem like the topic of AI and copyright was everywhere in the copyright world last year. While some digital topics have been known to cause a great commotion in copyright circles only to later sink practically without a trace, unless I am mistaken, the issue of the copyright implications of AI is different.

article thumbnail

AI Generated Art and its conflict with IPR

IIPRD

CAN is a technology developed by computer scientists and art historians, it is made in a way that it uses input of pieces of original art and works of people which could date back couple centuries to the most recent ones, by using such inputs it then creates a novel piece which could pass off as that of a human artwork. [1]

Art 52
article thumbnail

Announcing the Sixth Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials by Tushnet & Goldman

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Chapter 7: Special Topics in Competitor Lawsuits. FTC and the Trademark Modernization Act. I have more to say on that topic imminently). We reworked the privacy chapter, mostly to pare it down because the topic has mushroomed to the point where it’s not possible to summarize all of the details.

Editing 119