Remove topics third-party
article thumbnail

Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law: The NYT v. OpenAI – Fair Use Implications of Generative AI

JD Supra Law

The legal implications of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically generative AI, quickly became a topic of casual conversation following the launch of ChatGPT in November of 2022. Generative AI platforms necessarily rely upon large pools of data, oftentimes including unlicensed third-party. By: Baker Donelson

article thumbnail

Czech court finds that AI tool DALL-E cannot be the author of a copyright work

The IPKat

The prompt used by the claimant in this case had been: “ Create a visual representation of two parties signing a business contract in a formal setting, such as a conference room or a law firm office in Prague. DALL-E is a text-to-image model developed by OpenAI to generate digital images from natural language descriptions, called "prompts."

Copyright 145
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

NFTs and Intellectual Property: What IP Owners and NFT Creators Need to Know

Intellectual Property Law Blog

NFT creators need to be mindful of potential infringement issues when using third party IP and should also consider IP protection for their original creations. To learn more about this topic, read our whitepaper: NFTs and Intellectual Property: What IP Owners and NFT Creators Need to Know.

article thumbnail

Disclosures And Enforceability Of Standard-Essential Patents (Part 7 of 7)

JD Supra Law

CONCLUSION and Footnotes - Disclosures of potentially standard-essential patents and patent applications have for long been a topic of little interest for third parties to the collaborative standardization process.

Patent 52
article thumbnail

TTABlog Test: Are Gummy Vitamins Related to Personal Care Products Under Section 2(d)?

The TTABlog

Examining Attorney Yat Sye Lee submitted internet evidence that some eighteen different companies offer the goods of both applicant and registrant under the same mark (including SEPHORA, BATH & BODY WORKS, and PACIFICA), along with twenty use-based third-party registrations covering these goods.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Protects Services That Permit Anonymous Third-Party Posts–Bride v. Snap

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Imposing such a duty would “necessarily require [Defendants] to monitor third-party content,” e.g., in the form of requiring Defendants to ensure that each user’s post on their applications is traceable to a specifically identifiable person. Third-Party Content. ” To get around this, the plaintiffs cited Lemmon v.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Preempts Game User’s Lawsuit Over Game Moderators’ Behavior–Quinteros v. Forge of Empires

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity for claims based on third-party content. In addition, “Plaintiff has not cited any duty of Defendants to protect Plaintiff from alleged harassment by third parties in a video game.” Plus, Section 230 applies to any statements made by third parties. Section 230.

Contracts 112